The role of management accounting in improving both environmental and financial performance through enhanced accountability is attracting increased recognition. However, universities have typically failed to be the focus of attention, generally, because of a mistaken belief that they generate only insignificant environmental impacts. A case-study of an Australian university demonstrates that there is a general lack of consideration given to the management of environmental costs and related cost-savings, due partly to a perceived lack of appreciation by senior management of the extent of environmental costs being incurred. Further, in the absence of relevant environmental cost information, although environmental sustainability itself is promoted as important, efforts to improve internal environmental accountability from an accounting perspective are lacking. In this study, interviews were conducted to identify barriers which affect the adoption of EMA. The results show that perceived institutional pressures and a low profile of accounting for the environment, and management’s attitudes influence the adoption of EMA within universities.
History
Publication title
Environmental management accounting for cleaner production
Editors
Schaltegger Stefan, Bennett Martin, Burritt Roger L., Jasch Christine
Pagination
301-320
ISBN
978-1-4020-8912-1
Department/School
TSBE
Publisher
Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Place of publication
Netherlands
Extent
27
Rights statement
Copyright 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Expanding knowledge in commerce, management, tourism and services