Is epistemic injustice a form of distributive injustice? In her early, profoundly influential work on epistemic injustice Miranda Fricker makes it clear that she does not think it is. In a recent article, however, she has expanded her conception of epistemic injustice to include something she calls distributive epistemic injustice, which she characterizes as "the unfair distribution of epistemic goods such as education or information" (Fricker 2013: 1318). She contrasts this with her earlier, narrower, conception of the subject, which she now prefers to call discriminatory epistemic injustice. In what follows I will challenge Pricker's distinction between discriminatory and distributive epistemic injustice; each of the forms of epistemic injustice that Fricker describes is a form of distributive injustice (or at any rate can be fruitfully treated as such) and that considerable insight into the nature of these injustices, and into the interrelations between them, can be gained from recognizing this fact.
History
Publication title
The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice
Editors
IJ Kidd, J Medina, and G Pohlhaus, Jr.
Pagination
61-68
ISBN
978-1-138-82825-4
Department/School
School of Humanities
Publisher
Routledge
Place of publication
United Kingdom
Extent
37
Rights statement
Copyright 2017 Ian James Kidd, Jose Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus, Jr., editorial and selection matter; individual chapters, the contributors
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies