A historical tracing suggested that the concept of comity has its root from public international law. In modern days, it forms a rationale underpinning the doctrine of forum non conveniens in private international law. However, Australia has rejected a popular formulation of the ‘more appropriate forum’ test used in England and other common law jurisdictions and instead decided to adopt a more stringent test of ‘clearly inappropriate forum’. To what extent is this version of the forum non conveniens doctrine in compatible with the comity concept? It is argued that the courts in Australia largely pay lip service to the comity concept in their consideration.
History
Publication title
Blurry Boundaries of Public and Private International Law: Towards Convergence or Divergent Still?
Edition
1st
Editors
P Sooksripaisarnkit and D Prasad
Pagination
51-66
ISBN
9789811684791
Department/School
Maritime and Logistics Management
Publisher
Springer
Publication status
Published
Place of publication
Singapore
Extent
15
Rights statement
Copyright 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.