Traditional argument theories focus on how the structure of statements determines their contribution to an argument. Such theories are useful in analysing arguments as products, or for analysing the sub-arguments that are generated during an argumentation. This paper outlines a method for analysing an argumentation as a process, focusing on the social interactions between pairs of Year 8 students and the teacher-researcher in the context of geometric reasoning
History
Publication title
Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Editors
H.L. Chick & J..L. Vincent
Pagination
281-288
ISSN
0771-100X
Department/School
Faculty of Education
Publisher
University of Melbourne
Place of publication
online
Event title
29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education