From a pragmatic viewpoint, language has evolved because of its functions in making meaning out of a given environment (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004). The primary tense expresses what is present at the time of speaking, for example ‘it is’ or ‘it isn’t’; whereas modality expresses certainty or possibility, for example ‘it has to be’ or ‘it can be.’ Although the study of pragmatics in mathematics language has been carried out (e.g. Rowland, 2000), children’s use of modality has not been studied, even though much mathematical language relies on the use of modality both deontic (the necessity or possibility of acts) and epistemic (the speaker’s beliefs).
History
Publication title
Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Educati
Volume
6
Editors
P Liljedahl, C Nicol, S Oesterle, D Allan
Pagination
181
ISSN
0771-100X
Department/School
Faculty of Education
Publisher
The International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Place of publication
Czech Republic
Event title
38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education