University Of Tasmania

File(s) under permanent embargo

Community Innovation Survey. Improving the quality of CIS data for innovation expenditures and turnover shares

conference contribution
posted on 2023-05-26, 08:12 authored by Arundel, A, van Cruysen, A
Since the first CIS survey, there have been concerns over the quality of the CIS results for the amount that enterprises spend on different innovative activities (Question 5.2 in the standard CIS 2010 questionnaire) and in the share of sales from new to market and new to firm product innovations (question 2.3). For the first three CIS surveys these concerns were partly driven by low item response rates for these questions, particularly for innovation expenditures, and the effect of these low response rates on the representativeness of the results. These concerns have decreased over time with notable improvements in item response rates, from approximately 50% for CIS-1 to 80% for CIS-4. However, concerns over the accuracy and comparability (across sectors within a country or across countries) of the answers to these questions remain both among National Statistical Offices (NSOs) that implement the CIS surveys and data users. Several NSOs have reported that the total R&D expenditures reported in the CIS survey are greater or less than reported R&D expenditures in the national R&D survey. Users have noted that the data for the share of product sales from new-tomarket innovations are not comparable across countries, with very high shares in previous CIS surveys in Italy and in some of the new member states and low shares in highly innovative countries such as Denmark. Although the cause is partly known - what is new to the market for a transitional economy such as Romania is very different from what is new to the market in an advanced and sophisticated market such as Denmark, the goal of policy users is to obtain results that are comparable across countries. In response to these concerns, Eurostat asked MERIT to examine possible changes to the design of CIS questions 5.2 and 2.3 with the goal of improving the quality of the responses. This report provides an interim report for this task, based on the results of a survey of 32 European NSOs that conduct the CIS. The purpose of this interim report is to elicit suggestions on how to improve these questions. An example is provided in the German proposal (see the presentation by Christian Rammer). All suggestions will be evaluated and a short-list of concrete proposals for a redesign of these two questions will be included in the final report, with the goal of cognitively testing the redesigned questions in several member states. Of note, it may not be possible to solve all problems through a redesign of each question. Alternative for improving data quality include checking results with respondents, comparing CIS data with other data sources where possible, or adding additional questions which can either provide missing information or a reference for respondents.


Publication status

  • Unpublished

Event title

Working Group Meeting on Statistics on Science, Technology and Innovation

Event Venue


Date of Event (Start Date)


Date of Event (End Date)


Repository Status

  • Restricted

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania


    No categories selected