In the past two decades, multibeam sonar systems have become the preferred seabed mapping tool. Many users have assumed that multibeam bathymetry data are highly accurate in spatial position. In reality, both vertical and horizontal uncertainties exist in every data point. These uncertainties are often represented as one single measure of Total Propagated Uncertainty (TPU). TPU is important to understand because it affects the quality of products generated from multibeam bathymetry data. To account for the magnitude and spatial distribution of this influence, an objective uncertainty analysis is required. Randomisation is the key process in such an uncertainty analysis. This study compared two randomisation methods, restricted spatial randomness (RSR) and complete spatial randomness (CSR), in an uncertainty analysis of a slope gradient dataset derived from multibeam bathymetry data. CSR regards data error in every grid cell as independent and assumes that the data error varies within a known statistical distribution without any neighbourhood effect. RSR assumes spatial structure and thus spatial auto-correlation in the data.
History
Publication title
GeoHab (Maine Geological and Biological Habitat Mapping)
Editors
Daniel Ierodiaconou and Scott Nichol
Pagination
43
Department/School
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies
Publisher
Deakin University
Place of publication
Australia
Event title
Geohab 2014
Event Venue
Lorne, Australia
Date of Event (Start Date)
2014-05-05
Date of Event (End Date)
2014-05-09
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystems