Abstract. I believe that, for reasons elaborated elsewhere (Beall, 2009; Priest, 2006a, 2006b), the logic LP (Asenjo, 1966; Asenjo & Tamburino, 1975; Priest, 1979) is roughly right as far as logic goes.1 But logic cannot go everywhere; we need to provide nonlogical axioms to specify our (axiomatic) theories. This is uncontroversial, but it has also been the source of discomfort forLP-based theorists, particularly with respect to true mathematical theories which we take to be consistent. My example, throughout, is arithmetic; but the more general case is also considered.
History
Publication title
Review of Symbolic Logic
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pagination
1-10
ISSN
1755-0203
Department/School
School of Humanities
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Place of publication
United Kingdom
Rights statement
Copyright 2013 Association for Symbolic Logic
Repository Status
Open
Socio-economic Objectives
Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies