University of Tasmania
Browse
140329 - systematic review of health economic.pdf (23.49 MB)

A systematic review of the evolution of health-economic evaluation models of osteoarthritis

Download (23.49 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 16:47 authored by Ting ZhaoTing Zhao, Hasnat AhmadHasnat Ahmad, Barbara de GraaffBarbara de Graaff, Qing Xia, Tania WinzenbergTania Winzenberg, Dawn AitkenDawn Aitken, Andrew Palmer
Objective: To comprehensively synthesise the evolution of health-economic evaluation models (HEEMs) of all OA interventions including preventions, core treatments, adjunct non-pharmacological interventions, pharmacological and surgical treatments.

Methods: The literature was searched within health-economic/biomedical databases. Data extracted included: OA type, population characteristics, model setting/type/events, study perspective, comparators; and the reporting quality of the studies was assessed. The review protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration: CRD42018092937).

Results: Eighty-eight studies were included. Pharmacological and surgical interventions were the focus in 51% and 44% studies, respectively. Twenty-four studies adopted a societal perspective (with increasing popularity after 2013), however most (63%) did not include indirect costs. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was the most popular outcome measure since 2008. Markov models were used by 62% of studies, with increasing popularity since 2008. Until 2010, most studies used short-to-medium time horizons; subsequently a lifetime horizon became popular. Eighty-six percent of studies reported discount rate(s) (predominantly between 3% and 5%). Studies published after 2002 had a better coverage of OA-related adverse events (AEs). Reporting quality significantly improved after 2001.

Conclusions: OA HEEMs have evolved and improved substantially over time, with focus shifting from short-to-medium-term pharmacological decision-tree models to surgical-focused lifetime Markov models. Indirect costs of OA are frequently not considered, despite using a societal perspective. There was lack of reporting sensitivity of model outcome to input parameters including discount rate, OA definition, and population parameters. Whilst the coverage of OA-related AEs has improved over time, it is still not comprehensive.

History

Publication title

Arthritis Care & Research

Article number

accepted manuscript

Number

accepted manuscript

ISSN

2151-464X

Department/School

Menzies Institute for Medical Research

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Place of publication

United States

Rights statement

"This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: A Systematic Review of the Evolution of Health‐Economic Evaluation Models of Osteoarthritis, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24410. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions."

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Clinical health not elsewhere classified; Public health (excl. specific population health) not elsewhere classified