File(s) under permanent embargo
Aggravating or mitigating? Comparing judges’ and jurors’ views on four ambiguous sentencing factors
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 00:50 authored by Catherine WarnerCatherine Warner, Caroline SpiranovicCaroline Spiranovic, Freiberg, A, Davis, J, Bartels, LMental disorder, intellectual disability, intoxication and drug addiction are factors that are often raised in sentencing hearings, but the effect that these four conditions can have on an offender’s sentence is rarely studied. This article fills two gaps in our understanding of the relevance of these ambiguous sentencing factors: first, by analysing how judges in the County Court of Victoria responded to these factors in 122 sentencing cases relating to 140 sentenced offenders; and second, by comparing the views of the judges with those of 426 jurors who had tried those cases and who participated in the Victorian Jury Sentencing Study. It concludes that lay opinion on the relevance of these factors does not always align with judicial practice and discusses the implications of these findings.
Funding
Australian Research Council
History
Publication title
Journal of Judicial AdministrationVolume
28Pagination
51-66ISSN
1036-7918Department/School
Faculty of LawPublisher
Lawbook Co.Place of publication
AustraliaRights statement
Copyright 2018 Thomson ReutersRepository Status
- Restricted