posted on 2023-05-20, 13:27authored byGraham, MM, Sessler, DI, Parlow, JL, Biccard, BM, Guyatt, G, Leslie, K, Chan, MTV, Meyhoff, CS, Xavier, D, Sigamani, A, Kumar, PA, Mrkobrada, M, Cook, DJ, Tandon, V, Alvarez-Garcia, J, Villar, JC, Painter, TW, Landoni, G, Fleischmann, E, Lamy, A, Whitlock, R, Le Manach, Y, Aphang-Lam, M, Cata, JP, Gao, P, Nicolaas TerblancheNicolaas Terblanche, Ramana, PV, Jamieson, KA, Bessissow, A, Mendoza, GR, Ramirez, S, Diemunsch, PA, Yusuf, S, Devereaux, PJ
<strong>Background:</strong> Uncertainty remains about the effects of aspirin in patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) having noncardiac surgery.<p></p> <p><strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate benefits and harms of perioperative aspirin in patients with prior PCI.</p> <p><strong>Design:</strong> Nonprespecified subgroup analysis of a multicenter factorial trial. Computerized Internet randomization was done between 2010 and 2013. Patients, clinicians, data collectors, and outcome adjudicators were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01082874).</p> <p><strong>Setting:</strong> 135 centers in 23 countries.</p> <p><strong>Patients:</strong> Adults aged 45 years or older who had or were at risk for atherosclerotic disease and were having noncardiac surgery. Exclusions were placement of a bare-metal stent within 6 weeks, placement of a drug-eluting stent within 1 year, or receipt of nonstudy aspirin within 72 hours before surgery.</p> <p><strong>Intervention:</strong> Aspirin therapy (overall trial, <i>n</i> = 4998; subgroup, <i>n</i> = 234) or placebo (overall trial, <i>n</i> = 5012; subgroup, <i>n</i> = 236) initiated within 4 hours before surgery and continued throughout the perioperative period. Of the 470 subgroup patients, 99.9% completed follow-up.</p> <p><strong>Measurements:</strong> The 30-day primary outcome was death or nonfatal myocardial infarction; bleeding was a secondary outcome.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> In patients with prior PCI, aspirin reduced the risk for the primary outcome (absolute risk reduction, 5.5% [95% CI, 0.4% to 10.5%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 [CI, 0.26 to 0.95]; <i>P</i> for interaction = 0.036) and for myocardial infarction (absolute risk reduction, 5.9% [CI, 1.0% to 10.8%]; HR, 0.44 [CI, 0.22 to 0.87]; <i>P</i> for interaction = 0.021). The effect on the composite of major and life-threatening bleeding in patients with prior PCI was uncertain (absolute risk increase, 1.3% [CI, -2.6% to 5.2%]). In the overall population, aspirin increased the risk for major bleeding (absolute risk increase, 0.8% [CI, 0.1% to 1.6%]; HR, 1.22 [CI, 1.01 to 1.48]; <i>P</i> for interaction = 0.50).</p> <p><strong>Limitation:</strong> Nonprespecified subgroup analysis with small sample.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Perioperative aspirin may be more likely to benefit rather than harm patients with prior PCI.</p>