University Of Tasmania

File(s) not publicly available

Australian general practitioners' views and use of tests to detect early prostate cancer

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-16, 11:31 authored by Ward, J, Young, J, Michael SladdenMichael Sladden
To describe general practitioners' current beliefs, knowledge and self-reported practices in prostate cancer screening, we conducted a national survey of 1271 general practitioners, obtaining 855 completed questionnaires (67% response rate). Available tests for prostate cancer screening, namely DRE and PSA alone and in combination, were indicated to be effective by 49%, 43% and 68% of respondents respectively, with older GPs significantly more likely to hold these views. The effect of guidelines was mixed. Less than 8% of respondents indicated they did not recommend screening. Although the majority of GPs were unlikely to adopt an opportunistic approach to prostate cancer screening, 63%, 57% and 46% indicated they would recommend DRE, PSA or both respectively during a dedicated health check up. Awareness of relevant guidelines was low, with nearly half of respondents unable to recall publications from the RACGP or ACS. Counter-intuitively awareness of ACS guidelines for prostate cancer screening (which advise against screening) was significantly associated with the converse behaviour. Findings from this first national study behove proactive and highly targeted dissemination in general practice of the AHTAC policy announced by the Commonwealth Health Minister in August 1996.


Publication title

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health








Tasmanian School of Medicine


Public Health Assoc Australia Inc

Place of publication

Po Box 319, Curtin, Australia, Act, 2600

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Other health not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania