Bias introduced by the non-random movement of fish in visual transect surveys
Version 2 2024-09-17, 02:12Version 2 2024-09-17, 02:12
Version 1 2023-05-17, 17:06Version 1 2023-05-17, 17:06
journal contribution
posted on 2024-09-17, 02:12 authored by Reginald WatsonReginald Watson, Gary CarlosGary Carlos, MA SamoilysNon-random movement has been observed in a number of reef fish species but its effect on visual counts has not been previously examined. A simulation program Reefex was used to examine the relationship between the speed and approach angle of fish, and the degree of bias introduced in estimates of fish numbers from visual transects. Fish approaching at right-angles to the direction of the transect did not introduce a bias regardless of their speed. Fish approaching against the diver introduced a positive bias which increased linearly with fish speed. Fish moving in the direction of the diver created a negative bias, fish counts decreased linearly until fish speed matched that of the diver. This minimum value reflected the immediately visible portion of the entire transect that could be surveyed instantaneously by the diver when the survey began. Changes in the effective area surveyed determine bias. An equation is presented which relates bias to fish speed, angle of approach, diver speed, transect length and visibility. © 1995.
History
Publication title
Ecological ModellingVolume
77Issue
2-3Pagination
205-214ISSN
0304-3800Department/School
Sustainable Marine Research Collaboration, IMAS DirectoratePublisher
Elsevier BVPublication status
- Published
Place of publication
NetherlandsSocio-economic Objectives
100305 Wild caught fin fish (excl. tuna)Usage metrics
Categories
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC