Burns sustained from body heating devices: an integrative review
Methods: PubMed, CINHAL, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched from inception up until January 13, 2020, for studies/case reports on burns sustained from body heating devices that were published in the English language.
Results: Medical records from 10 retrospective studies yielded 1343 patients with burns, of whom the majority were women (63.4%) with a mean age of 27.7 years (range, 0–92 years). Devices included hot water bottles, hot wheat bags, and heating pads. Sites of injury were predominantly in the lower limbs and feet, with other sites reported (ie, abdomen, pelvis, buttocks, perineum, and upper limbs). Burns sustained typically had low total burn surface area (TBSA) but often involved partial-thickness to full-thickness burn injury. The proportion of patients requiring surgery ranged from 15% to 87.4% for hot water bottle injuries and 91% for wheat bag injuries. Women were predominately represented in the case series/reports. Burns had low TBSA with hot water bottles, and heating pads were the most common mechanism of injury, predominately women following breast reconstructive surgeries.
Conclusions: Burns from body heating devices are often preventable. Community education and improved manufacture labelling on the appropriate use and potential risks should be required. The patient’s cognitive ability and physiology must be considered to minimize incidence and severity of injury.
Funding
University of Tasmania
History
Publication title
WoundsVolume
32Issue
5Pagination
123-133ISSN
1044-7946Department/School
School of NursingPublisher
H M P CommunicationsPlace of publication
83 General Warren Blvd, Ste 100, Malvern, USA, Pa, 19355Rights statement
Copyright 2020 HMP CommunicationRepository Status
- Restricted