The project of modernising Western herbal medicine in order to allow it to be accepted by the public and to contribute to contemporary healthcare is now over two decades old. One aspect of this project involves changes to the ways knowledge about medicinal plants is presented. This paper contrasts the models of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and Traditional Knowledge (TK) to illuminate some of the complexities which have arisen consequent to these changes, particularly with regard to the concept of vitalism, the retention or rejection of which may have broad implications for the clinical practice of herbal medicine. Illustrations from two herbals (central texts on the medicinal use of plants) demonstrate the differences between these frameworks in regard to how herbs are understood. Further, a review of articles on herbal therapeutics published in the Australian Journal of Herbal Medicine indicates that practitioners are moving away from TK and towards the use of EBM in their clinical discussions.
History
Publication title
Social Science & Medicine
Volume
67
Pagination
2098-2106
ISSN
0277-9536
Department/School
School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Publisher
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Place of publication
United Kingdom
Rights statement
Copyright 2008 Elsevier
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Public health (excl. specific population health) not elsewhere classified