Chinese patients' preference for pharmaceutical treatments of osteoporosis: a discrete choice experiment
Purpose: This study was performed to elicit Chinese patients' preferences for osteoporosis medication treatment and to investigate the heterogeneities of the preferences in subgroups.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment comprising 15 choice sets with 4 important attributes was conducted in a Chinese population at risk of osteoporotic fracture. The four attributes were treatment efficacy in reducing the risk of fracture, out-of-pocket cost per year, adverse effects of treatment, and mode of administration. The patients were asked to choose between two hypothetical treatments; they could also choose no treatment. Mixed logit models were used, and any observed heterogeneity in the patients' preferences was further assessed in subgroup analyses.
Results: In total, 267 patients were analysed. On average, the patients preferred to receive treatment rather than no treatment. The patients preferred treatment with higher efficacy in preventing fracture and lower out-of-pocket cost. The least preferred adverse effect of medication was gastrointestinal disorders, followed by flu-like symptoms and finally skin reactions. The most preferred mode of administration was annual intravenous infusion, followed by 6-month subcutaneous injection, a weekly oral tablet, and daily nasal spray; daily oral tablets ranked as the least preferred mode of administration. The differences in the patients' preferences among all attributes were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Patients' age was found to contribute to the observed preference heterogeneity in most of the included attributes.
Conclusions: This study revealed Chinese patients' preferences for osteoporosis treatments. Annual intravenous infusion and 6-month subcutaneous injection were significantly preferred over weekly oral tablets in this Chinese population.
History
Publication title
Archives of OsteoporosisVolume
14Article number
85Number
85Pagination
1-9ISSN
1862-3522Department/School
Menzies Institute for Medical ResearchPublisher
Springer UKPlace of publication
United KingdomRights statement
Copyright International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2019Repository Status
- Restricted