University of Tasmania
Browse
- No file added yet -

Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing

Version 2 2024-09-27, 03:54
Version 1 2023-07-31, 01:48
journal contribution
posted on 2024-09-27, 03:54 authored by Jane Tiller, Andrew Bakshi, Grace Dowling, Louise Keogh, Aideen McInerney-Leo, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Tiffany Boughtwood, Penny Gleeson, Martin B Delatycki, Ingrid Winship, Margaret OtlowskiMargaret Otlowski, Paul Lacaze
Fears of genetic discrimination in life insurance continue to deter some Australians from genetic testing. In July 2019, the life insurance industry introduced a partial, self-regulated moratorium restricting the use of genetic results in underwriting, applicable to policies up to certain limits (eg AUD$500,000 for death cover).We administered an online survey to consumers who had taken, or been offered, clinical genetic testing for adult-onset conditions, to gather views and experiences about the moratorium and the use of genetic results in life insurance, including its regulation.Most respondents (n = 367) had undertaken a genetic test (89%), and had a positive test result (76%; n = 243/321). Almost 30% (n = 94/326) reported testing after 1 July 2019. Relatively few respondents reported knowing about the moratorium (16%; n = 54/340) or that use of genetic results in life insurance underwriting is legal (17%; n = 60/348). Only 4% (n = 14/350) consider this practice should be allowed. Some respondents reported ongoing difficulties accessing life insurance products, even after the moratorium. Further, discrimination concerns continue to affect some consumers' decision-making about having clinical testing and applying for life insurance products, despite the Moratorium being in place. Most respondents (88%; n = 298/340) support the introduction of legislation by the Australian government to regulate this issue.Despite the introduction of a partial moratorium in Australia, fears of genetic discrimination persist, and continue to deter people from genetic testing. Consumers overwhelmingly consider life insurers should not be allowed to use genetic results in underwriting, and that federal legislation is required to regulate this area.

History

Sub-type

  • Article

Publication title

European Journal of Human Genetics

Medium

Print-Electronic

Volume

32

Issue

3

Pagination

286-294:9

eISSN

1476-5438

ISSN

1018-4813

Department/School

Law

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE

Publication status

  • Published

Place of publication

England

Event Venue

Public Health Genomics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. jane.tiller@monash.edu.

Rights statement

© The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Usage metrics

    Faculty of Law

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC