posted on 2023-05-22, 01:02authored byDianne NicolDianne Nicol, Lisa EcksteinLisa Eckstein, Bentzen, HB, Borry, P, Burgess, M, Burke, W, Donald ChalmersDonald Chalmers, Cho, M, Dove, E, Fullerton, S, Ida, R, Kato, K, Kaye, J, Koenig, B, Manson, S, McGrail, K, McGuire, A, Meslin, E, O'Doherty, K, Prainsack, B, Shabani, M, Tabor, H, Thorogood, A, de Vries, J
In their Policy Forum “Toward unrestricted use of public genomic data” (25 January, p. 350), R. I. Amann et al. argue that once data has been cleared for release to the public domain by institutions, it should be open for use without further restrictions. However, they neglect the key point that researchers and their institutions are entrusted by research participants, funders, and others with weighing the pros and cons of public data release. By suggesting that informed consent can provide a straightforward path to data release, they overlook evidence that once people understand their options, only a little more than half opt for open data sharing, and some refuse data sharing altogether.
Funding
Australian Research Council
History
Publication title
Science
Volume
364
Issue
6439
Pagination
446
ISSN
0036-8075
Department/School
Faculty of Law
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science