University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Conversations between judges and children: An argument in favour of judicial conferences in contested children's matters

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-16, 23:52 authored by Fernando, MM
This article discusses the infrequent practice of judges speaking directly with children, or 'judicial conferencing'. It is argued that there are good reasons why judges should speak with children. Children have a right to be heard in proceedings affecting them, and many express they want to be involved. Judges, in making decisions, must take children's views into account. Judicial conferencing allows children's views to be presented without filtering by third parties, ensuring informed decisions are made on the best available evidence. The results will be to empower children in a situation where they otherwise have very little input and control, and to promote decisions which are truly in children's best interests. While the flexibility created by the Less Adversarial Trial is ideal for increased judicial interaction with children, any actual increase will require an attitudinal shift on the part of many judges who are reluctant to embrace the practice.

History

Publication title

Australian Journal of Family Law

Volume

23

Pagination

48-70

ISSN

0817-623X

Department/School

Faculty of Law

Publisher

Reed International Books

Place of publication

Chatswood

Rights statement

Copyright 2009 LexisNexis

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Justice and the law not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC