Disclosure of genetic information without consent of the patient (proband) challenges the legal frameworks of privacy and confidentiality. Changes to privacy legislation enable and provide guidelines for undertaking disclosure, with the purpose of reducing the harm to genetic relatives who, armed with such information, may seek predictive testing themselves. Nevertheless, significant uncertainty remains for health care professionals in the application of the discretion to disclose genetic information to at-risk relatives. First, jurisdictional inconsistencies in privacy legislation present challenges for the provision of genetic services across the country. Second, the current guidelines provide insufficient clarity regarding the justification for disclosure of genetic information to reduce psychological harm to relatives. Third, the implications of a potential expansion of a legal duty of care to inform genetic relatives in some circumstances indicates that such a duty would be unduly burdensome for health care professionals, and suggests that revision of the threshold for use – rather than disclosure – of depersonalised genetic information may represent a pragmatic way forward.
History
Publication title
Journal of Law and Medicine
Volume
27
Pagination
108-121
ISSN
1320-159X
Department/School
Faculty of Law
Publisher
Lawbook Co.
Place of publication
Australia
Rights statement
Copyright 2019 Thomson Reuters
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Bioethics; Expanding knowledge in law and legal studies