posted on 2023-05-20, 21:18authored byMilner-Gulland, EJ, Addison, P, Arlidge, WNS, Baker, J, Booth, H, Thomas BrooksThomas Brooks, Bull, JW, Burgass, MJ, Ekstrom, J, zu Ermgassen, SOSE, Fleming, LV, Grub, HMJ, von Hase, A, Hoffmann, M, Hutton, J, Juffe-Bignoli, D, ten Kate, K, Kiesecker, J, Kumpel, NF, Maron, M, Newing, HS, Ole-Moiyoi, K, Sinclair, C, Sinclair, S, Starkey, M, Stuart, SN, Tayleur, C, Watson, JEM
The upcoming Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) meeting, and adoption of the new Global Biodiversity Framework, represent an opportunity to transform humanity's relationship with nature. Restoring nature while meeting human needs requires a bold vision, including mainstreaming biodiversity conservation in society. We present a framework that could support this: the Mitigation and Conservation Hierarchy. This places the Mitigation Hierarchy for mitigating and compensating the biodiversity impacts of developments (1, avoid; 2, minimize; 3, restore; and 4, offset, toward a target such as "no net loss" of biodiversity) within a broader framing encompassing all conservation actions. We illustrate its application by national governments, sub-national levels (specifically the city of London, a fishery, and Indigenous groups), companies, and individuals. The Mitigation and Conservation Hierarchy supports the choice of actions to conserve and restore nature, and evaluation of the effectiveness of those actions, across sectors and scales. It can guide actions toward a sustainable future for people and nature, supporting the CBD's vision.
History
Publication title
One Earth
Volume
4
Pagination
75-87
ISSN
2590-3330
Department/School
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies
Publisher
Cell Press
Place of publication
United States
Rights statement
Copyright 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Repository Status
Open
Socio-economic Objectives
Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystems