University Of Tasmania
140876 - Juror and community views of the guilty plea sentencing discount.pdf (443.78 kB)
Download file

Juror and community views of the guilty plea sentencing discount: findings from a national Australian study

Download (443.78 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 17:44 authored by Catherine WarnerCatherine Warner, Caroline SpiranovicCaroline Spiranovic, Bartels, L, Roberts, L, Gelb, K
A plea of guilty is a long-accepted factor mitigating sentence in many countries, including Australia, although academic debate over the merits and application of the discount is ongoing. This paper presents findings from a national Australian study on public opinion on the guilty plea sentencing discount, with a particular focus on sexual offences. Survey data were drawn from 989 jurors in cases that resulted in a guilty verdict and 450 unempanelled jurors and 306 online respondents who were provided with vignettes based on real cases. A third of the respondents would have supported a discount in their case if the offender had pleaded guilty. In contrast, more than one half of the respondents surveyed, who had received a vignette with a guilty plea scenario, supported an increment in sentence if the offender had gone to trial. There was more support for a discount in cases involving non-sexual violent offences versus sexual offences and adult versus child victims. Where a discount was supported, this most commonly was a reduction in the length of custodial sentence, with online respondents allocating the least generous discounts. Willingness to accept a sentencing discount was predicted by a range of variables including gender, education, punitive attitudes, offence type and offence seriousness. We conclude by considering the implications of our findings for sentencing law and practice.


Publication title

Criminology & Criminal Justice








Faculty of Law


Sage Publications

Place of publication


Rights statement

Copyright 2020 the authors. Accepted for publication in Criminology & Criminal Justice.

Repository Status

  • Open

Socio-economic Objectives

Criminal justice; Legal processes; Justice and the law not elsewhere classified