File(s) under permanent embargo
MOA-2010-BLG-328LB: A sub-Neptune orbiting very late M dwarf?
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-17, 21:56 authored by Furusawa, K, Udalski, A, Sumi, T, Bennett, DP, Bond, IA, Gould, A, Jorgensen, UG, Snodgrass, C, Prester, DD, Albrow, MD, Abe, F, Botzler, CS, Chote, P, Freeman, M, Fukui, A, Harris, P, Itow, Y, Ling, CH, Masuda, K, Matsubara, Y, Miyake, N, Muraki, Y, Ohnishi, K, Rattenbury, NJ, Saito, T, Sullivan, DJ, Suzuki, D, Sweatman, WL, Tristram, PJ, Wada, K, Yock, PCM, Szymanski, MK, Soszynski, I, Kubiak, M, Poleski, R, Ulaczyk, K, Pietrzynski, G, Wyrzykowski, A, Choi, J-Y, Christie, GW, DePoy, DL, Dong, S, Drummond, J, Gaudi, BS, Han, C, Hung, L-W, Hwang, K-H, Lee, C-U, McCormick, J, Moorhouse, D, Natusch, T, Nola, M, Ofek, E, Pogge, RW, Shin, I-G, Skowron, J, Thornley, G, Yee, JC, Alsubai, KA, Bozza, V, Browne, P, Burgdorf, MJ, Novati, SC, Dodds, P, Dominik, M, Finet, F, Gerner, T, Hardis, S, Harpsoe, K, Hinse, TC, Hundertmark, M, Kains, N, Kerins, E, Liebig, C, Mancini, L, Mathiasen, M, Penny, MT, Proft, S, Rahvar, S, Ricci, D, Scarpetta, G, Schafer, S, Schonebeck, F, Southworth, J, Surdej, J, Wambsganss, J, Street, RA, Bramich, DM, Steele, IA, Tsapras, Y, Horne, K, Donatowicz, J, Sahu, KC, Bachelet, E, Batista, V, Beatty, TG, Beaulieu, J-P, Bennett, CS, Black, C, Bowens-Rubin, R, Brillant, S, Caldwell, JAR, Cassan, A, Andrew ColeAndrew Cole, Corrales, E, Coutures, C, Dieters, S, Fouque, P, Greenhill, J, Henderson, CB, Kubas, D, Marquette, J-B, Martin, R, Menzies, JW, Shappee, B, Williams, A, Wouters, D, van Saders, J, Zellem, R, Zub, MWe analyze the planetary microlensing event MOA-2010-BLG-328. The best fit yields host and planetary masses of M h = 0.11 ± 0.01 M ☉ and M p = 9.2 ± 2.2 M ⊕, corresponding to a very late M dwarf and sub-Neptune-mass planet, respectively. The system lies at D L = 0.81 ± 0.10 kpc with projected separation r ⊥ = 0.92 ± 0.16 AU. Because of the host's a priori unlikely close distance, as well as the unusual nature of the system, we consider the possibility that the microlens parallax signal, which determines the host mass and distance, is actually due to xallarap (source orbital motion) that is being misinterpreted as parallax. We show a result that favors the parallax solution, even given its close host distance. We show that future high-resolution astrometric measurements could decisively resolve the remaining ambiguity of these solutions.
History
Publication title
Astrophysical JournalVolume
779Article number
91Number
91Pagination
1-12ISSN
0004-637XDepartment/School
School of Natural SciencesPublisher
IOP PublishingPlace of publication
190 North Independence Mall West, Suite 601, Phil.Rights statement
Copyright 2013 The American Astronomical SocietyRepository Status
- Restricted
