MOA-2010-BLG-328LB: A sub-Neptune orbiting very late M dwarf?
Version 2 2025-01-15, 00:59Version 2 2025-01-15, 00:59
Version 1 2023-05-17, 21:56Version 1 2023-05-17, 21:56
journal contribution
posted on 2025-01-15, 00:59authored byK Furusawa, A Udalski, T Sumi, DP Bennett, IA Bond, A Gould, UG Jorgensen, C Snodgrass, DD Prester, MD Albrow, F Abe, CS Botzler, P Chote, M Freeman, A Fukui, P Harris, Y Itow, CH Ling, K Masuda, Y Matsubara, N Miyake, Y Muraki, K Ohnishi, NJ Rattenbury, T Saito, DJ Sullivan, D Suzuki, WL Sweatman, PJ Tristram, K Wada, PCM Yock, MK Szymanski, I Soszynski, M Kubiak, R Poleski, K Ulaczyk, G Pietrzynski, A Wyrzykowski, J-Y Choi, GW Christie, DL DePoy, S Dong, J Drummond, BS Gaudi, C Han, L-W Hung, K-H Hwang, C-U Lee, J McCormick, D Moorhouse, T Natusch, M Nola, E Ofek, RW Pogge, I-G Shin, J Skowron, G Thornley, JC Yee, KA Alsubai, V Bozza, P Browne, MJ Burgdorf, SC Novati, P Dodds, M Dominik, F Finet, T Gerner, S Hardis, K Harpsoe, TC Hinse, M Hundertmark, N Kains, E Kerins, C Liebig, L Mancini, M Mathiasen, MT Penny, S Proft, S Rahvar, D Ricci, G Scarpetta, S Schafer, F Schonebeck, J Southworth, J Surdej, J Wambsganss, RA Street, DM Bramich, IA Steele, Y Tsapras, K Horne, J Donatowicz, KC Sahu, E Bachelet, V Batista, TG Beatty, Jean-Philippe BeaulieuJean-Philippe Beaulieu, CS Bennett, C Black, R Bowens-Rubin, S Brillant, JAR Caldwell, A Cassan, Andrew ColeAndrew Cole, E Corrales, C Coutures, S Dieters, P Fouque, J Greenhill, CB Henderson, D Kubas, J-B Marquette, R Martin, JW Menzies, B Shappee, A Williams, D Wouters, J van Saders, R Zellem, M Zub
We analyze the planetary microlensing event MOA-2010-BLG-328. The best fit yields host and planetary masses of Mh = 0.11 ± 0.01 M☉ and Mp = 9.2 ± 2.2 M⊕, corresponding to a very late M dwarf and sub-Neptune-mass planet, respectively. The system lies at DL = 0.81 ± 0.10 kpc with projected separation r⊥ = 0.92 ± 0.16 AU. Because of the host's a priori unlikely close distance, as well as the unusual nature of the system, we consider the possibility that the microlens parallax signal, which determines the host mass and distance, is actually due to xallarap (source orbital motion) that is being misinterpreted as parallax. We show a result that favors the parallax solution, even given its close host distance. We show that future high-resolution astrometric measurements could decisively resolve the remaining ambiguity of these solutions.
History
Publication title
Astrophysical Journal
Volume
779
Issue
2
Article number
91
Number
91
Pagination
1-12
ISSN
0004-637X
Department/School
School of Natural Sciences, Physics
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Publication status
Published
Place of publication
190 North Independence Mall West, Suite 601, Phil.
Rights statement
Copyright 2013 The American Astronomical Society
Socio-economic Objectives
280120 Expanding knowledge in the physical sciences