This article argues that an institutional logics framework is critical for developing a shared responsibility approach to managing the grand challenge of biosecurity in Australian agriculture. We identify the dominant logics evident in the Australian biosecurity context. In doing so, we draw attention to how a shared responsibility approach is compromised by tensions created by multiple logics, such as varying interpretations of biosecurity roles and responsibilities that different actors hold. However, in reframing such tensions from an institutional ambidexterity framework, we argue that a shared responsibility approach is achievable and, through examples from the Australian context, highlight the sites and spaces through which it may be fostered. We argue that identifying these sites and spaces requires that scholars conceptualise logics as blended rather than as discrete modes of operation.
Funding
Australian Research Council
Charles Sturt University
History
Publication title
Australian Journal of Management
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pagination
534-550
ISSN
0312-8962
Department/School
TSBE
Publisher
Sage Publications Ltd.
Place of publication
United Kingdom
Rights statement
Copyright 2019 The authors
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Control of pests, diseases and exotic species in terrestrial environments; Other environmental management not elsewhere classified