In this era of fiscal constraint following the global financial crisis, marine protected areas (MPAs) occupy a remarkable position in the economic landscape. Few government authorities seem concerned about the prevalence of white elephants – illusionary MPAs that carry a financial cost. Whereas no government minister would consider developing a health system based solely on number of hospital beds (irrespective of whether all hospitals are concentrated within a single city, or occupants of beds have access to medical staff, or patients are living or dying), MPAs are largely assessed on a single numerical target (total area). Inconsistent self-identification adds an extra level of opaqueness. The net consequence is an unaccountable and under-performing system, an outcome that is both tragic and economically wasteful.
Funding
Australian Research Council
Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources
Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania
Department of Parks and Wildlife (Western Australia)
Department of Primary Industries NSW
Parks Victoria
Smithsonian Institution
History
Publication title
Aquatic Conservation
Volume
27
Pagination
4-9
ISSN
1099-0755
Department/School
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Place of publication
United Kingdom
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Rehabilitation or conservation of marine environments