University Of Tasmania

File(s) under permanent embargo

Missing data: the importance and impact of missing data from clinical research

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-18, 03:17 authored by Christine PadgettChristine Padgett, Skilbeck, CE, Mathew SummersMathew Summers
There is compelling evidence that traditional methods used to address the detrimental impacts of missing data are inadequate. Despite this, researchers have been slow to utilise newer statistical approaches known to be more effective. The aim of the current article is to offer a conceptual explanation of the rationale for using newer missing data techniques, with a focus on multiple imputation (MI). To illustrate the relative efficacy of deletion, single imputation and multiple imputation techniques in the clinical setting, 20 cases were selected randomly from a population study investigating the cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and 8 out of 20 cases had scores on one variable deleted to simulate a missing data set. Comparing the parameter estimates obtained by each technique to the known parameters of the complete data set revealed that MI outperformed deletion and single imputation approaches. It is therefore recommended that more sophisticated techniques such as MI should be considered in clinical research.


Publication title

Brain Impairment








School of Psychological Sciences


Cambridge University Press

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Rights statement

Copyright 2014 Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Clinical health not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania