File(s) under permanent embargo
Normal ranges of left atrial strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Methods: The authors searched the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for the key terms "left atrial/atrial/atrium" and "strain/function/deformation/stiffness" and "speckle tracking/Velocity Vector Imaging/edge tracking." Studies of global left atrial function using speckle-tracking were selected if they involved >30 normal or healthy participants without any cardiac risk factors. Normal ranges for reservoir strain, conduit strain, and contractile strain were computed using a random-effects model. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis was performed to explore between-study heterogeneity.
Results: Forty studies (2,542 healthy subjects) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed a normal reference range for reservoir strain of 39% (95% CI, 38%-41%, from 40 articles), for conduit strain of 23% (95% CI, 21%-25%, from 14 articles), and for contractile strain of 17% (95% CI, 16%-19%, from 18 articles). Meta-regression identified heart rate (P = .02) and body surface area (P = .003) as contributors to this heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed heterogeneity due to sample size (n > 100 vs N < 100, P = .02).
Conclusions: The normal reference ranges for the three components of left atrial function are demonstrated. The between-study heterogeneity is explained partly by heart rate, body surface area, and sample size.
History
Publication title
Journal of the American Society of EchocardiographyVolume
30Pagination
59-70ISSN
0894-7317Department/School
Menzies Institute for Medical ResearchPublisher
MosbyPlace of publication
Inc, 11830 Westline Industrial Dr, St Louis, USA, Mo, 63146-3318Rights statement
Copyright 2016 by the American Society of EchocardiographyRepository Status
- Restricted