University Of Tasmania

File(s) under permanent embargo

Post-release immune responses of Tasmanian devils vaccinated with an experimental devil facial tumour disease vaccine

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-21, 11:26 authored by Ruth PyeRuth Pye, Jocelyn DarbyJocelyn Darby, Andrew FliesAndrew Flies, Fox, S, Scott CarverScott Carver, Elmer, J, Swift, KR, Hogg, C, Pemberton, D, Gregory WoodsGregory Woods, Alan LyonsAlan Lyons

IContext: Disease is increasingly becoming a driver of wildlife population declines and an extinction risk. Vaccines are one of the most successful health interventions in human history, but few have been tested for mitigating wildlife disease. The transmissible cancer, devil facial tumour disease (DFTD), triggered the Tasmanian devil's (Sarcophilus harrisii) inclusion on the international endangered species list. In 2016, 33 devils from a DFTD-free insurance population were given an experimental DFTD vaccination before their wild release on the Tasmanian northern coast.

IAim: To determine the efficacy of the vaccination protocol and the longevity of the induced responses.

IMethod: Six trapping trips took place over the 2.5 years following release, and both vaccinated and incumbent devils had blood samples and tumour biopsies collected.

IKey results: In all, 8 of the 33 vaccinated devils were re-trapped, and six of those developed DFTD within the monitoring period. Despite the lack of protection provided by the vaccine, we observed signs of immune activation not usually found in unvaccinated devils. First, sera collected from the eight devils showed that anti-DFTD antibodies persisted for up to 2 years post-vaccination. Second, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes were found in three of four biopsies collected from vaccinated devils, which contrasts with the 'immune deserts' typical of DFTs; only 1 of the 20 incumbent devils with DFTD had a tumour biopsy exhibiting immune-cell infiltrate. Third, immunohistochemical analysis of the vaccinated devils' tumour biopsies identified the functional immune molecules associated with antigen-presenting cells (MHC-II) and T-cells (CD3), and the immune checkpoint molecule PD-1, all being associated with anti-tumour immunit 1000 y in other species.

IConclusions: These results correlate with our previous study on captive devils in which a prophylactic vaccine primed the devil immune system and, following DFTD challenge and tumour growth, immunotherapy induced complete tumour regressions. The field trial results presented here provide further evidence that the devil immune system can be primed to recognise DFTD cells, but additional immune manipulation could be needed for complete protection or induction of tumour regressions.

Implications: A protective DFTD vaccine would provide a valuable management approach for conservation of the Tasmanian devil.


Publication title

Wildlife Research










Menzies Institute for Medical Research


C S I R O Publishing

Place of publication


Rights statement

Copyright CSIRO 2021. Journal compilation

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Diagnosis of human diseases and conditions; Expanding knowledge in the biological sciences