University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Processio and the place of ontic being: John Milbank And James K.A. Smith on participation

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-19, 07:40 authored by Triffett, BP
James K.A. Smith argues that the ontology of participation associated with Radical Orthodoxy is incompatible with a Christian affirmation of the intrinsic being and goodness of creatures. In response, he proposes a Leibnizian view in which things are endowed with the innate dynamism of ‘force’. Creatures have a certain depth of being, and are intrinsically good, just because they each have an inner virtuality that they bring into expression. Such force is said to be a metaphysical component of the agent. In this paper it is asked whether John Milbank’s ontology of participation can be defended by distinguishing between two senses of being a subject. Perhaps it is possible for a creature to bring into expression what is an infused ‘alien’ gift rather than a metaphysical component - to be expressive subject, but not ontic subject, for divine power. However, while this distinction promises to make sense of the reception of an indwelling ‘other’ in grace, knowledge and love, neither proper substance nor proper existence can be received in this way. A creature must be the ontic subject for its being, after all. Still, divine being might proceed from God as radical indwelling gift, as non-ontic ground for ontic being.

History

Publication title

The Heythrop Journal: A Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology

Volume

57

Issue

6

Pagination

900-916

ISSN

0018-1196

Department/School

School of Humanities

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Rights statement

Copyright 2012 The Author

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC