Supporting more targeted comparative recordkeeping in decision making is proposed as a means to increase farmer confidence to change practices. A qualitative social research comparative recordkeeping activity, either benchmarking with other enterprises or targeted recordkeeping within their enterprise, were more open to change. Benchmarking or other comparative recordkeeping provided farmers with confidence to assess future opportunities and interpreting written or electronic records were more likely to approach change in a reactive or cautious manner. Formal benchmarking is not accessible or appropriate for all farmers but given the positive relationship between benchmarking and recordkeeping and confident decision making about future practices, providing more accessible forms of comparative recordkeeping through facilitative extension approaches could engage a wider range of farmers in successful change.
Funding
Meat and Livestock Australia
History
Publication title
Rural Extension and Innovation Systems Journal
Volume
14
Pagination
83-90
ISSN
2204-8758
Department/School
Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA)
Publisher
Australasia Pacific Extension Network
Place of publication
Australia
Rights statement
Copyright 2018 APEN
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Other education and training not elsewhere classified