This article argues that there exist unnecessary gaps in the regulation of the use of physical, mechanical and chemical restraints in mental health and aged care settings. While the use of these forms of restraint may be rationalised on the basis of preventing harm to self or others, there are adverse consequences that necessitate the minimisation, if not elimination, of their use. The overuse of mechanical and chemical restraints at the Oakden Older Persons Mental Health Service in South Australia led to several scathing inquiries. This article looks at the lessons learned and suggests a multidimensional, consistent approach is overdue.
History
Publication title
Alternative Law Journal
Volume
44
Pagination
29-36
ISSN
1037-969X
Department/School
Faculty of Law
Publisher
Sage Publications Ltd
Place of publication
United Kingdom
Rights statement
Copyright The Author(s) 2018
Repository Status
Open
Socio-economic Objectives
Civil justice; Law reform; Legislation, civil and criminal codes