posted on 2023-05-18, 16:32authored byMacLeod, MR, McLean, AL, Kyriakopoulou, A, Serghiou, S, de Wilde, A, Sherratt, N, Hirst, T, Hemblade, R, Bahor, Z, Nunes-Fonseca, C, Potluru, A, Thomson, A, Baginskitae, J, Egan, K, Vesterinen, H, Currie, GL, Churilov, L, David Howells, Sena, ES
The reliability of experimental findings depends on the rigour of experimental design. Here we show limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in a random sample of life sciences publications, significantly lower reporting of randomisation in work published in journals of high impact, and very limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in publications from leading United Kingdom institutions. Ascertainment of differences between institutions might serve both as a measure of research quality and as a tool for institutional efforts to improve research quality.
History
Publication title
Public Library of Science Biology
Volume
13
Issue
11
Article number
e1002273
Number
e1002273
Pagination
1-12
ISSN
1544-9173
Department/School
Tasmanian School of Medicine
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Place of publication
United States
Rights statement
Copyright 2015 Macleod et al. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/