University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Should we eat our research subjects? Advocacy and animal studies

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-19, 18:07 authored by Yvette WattYvette Watt, O'Sullivan, S, Probyn-Rapsey, F
This paper examines data from a survey of Animal Studies scholars undertaken by the authors in 2015. While the survey was broad ranging, this paper focuses on three interconnected elements; the respondents’ opinions on what role they think the field should play in regard to animal advocacy, their personal commitment to animal advocacy, and how their attitudes toward advocacy in the field differ depending on their dietary habits. While the vast majority of respondents believe that the field should demonstrate a commitment to animal wellbeing, our findings suggest that respondents’ level of commitment to animal advocacy is informed by whether they choose to eat animal products or not. We conclude that this reflects the breadth of the field as well as the fact that it is a relatively new area of study and as such is still evolving. In relation to the question posed in the title of this article – should we eat our research subjects? – it seems that Animal Studies scholars are divided on that issue; some do, some don’t, but for those who do eat their research subjects there is a degree of unease about the contradictions that such a choice implies.

History

Publication title

Animal Studies Journal

Volume

7

Article number

9

Number

9

Pagination

180-205

ISSN

2201-3008

Department/School

School of Creative Arts and Media

Publisher

The Animal Studies Journal, University of Wollongong.

Place of publication

Australia

Rights statement

Copyright 2018 The Author

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Bioethics

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC