Many new regulatory systems have been developed in Australia to improve environmental management. If administrative structures are not also improved, issues of accountability may arise. Regulation and operations must be separate so that operators do not exercise undue influence over regulators. This may happen where aprivate operator is able to "capture" the regulator by influencing decisions in its favour, or where the operator and regulator are both public bodies. Whilst capture may be the more insidious problem, if independence is compromised neither body will be fully accountable. This article considers the potential for regulatory capture of State government regulators by local government operators. An exploratory, multi-disciplinary approach is taken to the use of the Environmental Improvement Programs by the sewage treatment industry in Tasmania. After considering the relevant literature and context, a case study is presented to illustrate the dangers of failing to design administrative structures that avoid the potential for capture. For environmental accountability, it is recommended that legislators provide for an independent environmental protection agency to oversee the operation of new regulatory systems.
History
Publication title
Environmental And Planning Law Journal
Volume
17
Pagination
24-33
ISSN
0813-300X
Department/School
TSBE
Publisher
LBC Information Services
Place of publication
Australia
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Environmental policy, legislation and standards not elsewhere classified