University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Texting versus txtng: reading and writing text messages, and links with other linguistic skills

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-17, 03:22 authored by Nenagh KempNenagh Kemp
The media buzzes with assertions that the popular use of text-message abbreviations, or textisms (such as r for are) is masking or even causing literacy problems. This study examined the use and understanding of textisms, and links with more traditional language skills, in young adults. Sixty-one Australian university students read and wrote text messages in conventional English and in textisms. Textism messages were faster to write than those in conventional English, but took nearly twice as long to read, and caused more reading errors. Contrary to media concerns, higher scores on linguistic tasks were neutrally or positively correlated with faster and more accurate reading and writing of both message types. The types of textisms produced, and those least well understood by participants, are also discussed.

History

Publication title

Writing Systems Research

Pagination

53-71

ISSN

1758-6801

Department/School

School of Psychological Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Rights statement

The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: www.oxfordjournals.org

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Learner and learning not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC