The Uluru Statement from the Heart, issued in 2017 by representatives of Indigenous Australians, has reactivated simmering debates in Australia about political and legal recognition of Indigenous sovereignty. The Uluru Statement's calls for constitutional reform and bicultural treaty negotiations are premised on an understanding of sovereignty that is problematic because it elides fundamental doctrinal and political obstacles to attaining Indigenous sovereignty in its most expansive form while overlooking important gains already achieved or achievable for Indigenous control or shared management of natural resources and territory. This article critically evaluates the Uluru Statement in light of a deeper understanding of the political and legal permutations of the concept 'sovereignty' and existing governance reforms in Australia that offer a degree of 'internal sovereignty' short of separate nationhood status for Indigenous peoples.
History
Publication title
Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues
Volume
23
Issue
1-2
Pagination
18-41
ISSN
1440-5202
Department/School
Faculty of Law
Publisher
Moondani Toombadool Centre, Swinburne University of Technology
Place of publication
Australia
Rights statement
Copyright 2020 Swinburne University
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community services not elsewhere classified; Law reform