There is widespread but not universal acceptance that organisations should provide ‘accounts’ of not only their financial performance, but also of their social and environmental performance. There have also been various suggestions across time that traditional financial reporting frameworks, albeit with some modification, have relevance to calls for greater corporate accountability. This paper seeks to dismiss such suggestions. For the accounting profession to be able to meaningfully contribute to extending accountability beyond investors, lenders, and creditors (and it undoubtedly serves these interests well) it will need to abandon many core accounting conventions and principles – something that is deemed unlikely to occur – at least in the readers’ lifetime. This paper also highlights the apparent absurdity of using market-based mechanisms (such as cap-and-trade systems for pollutants) to solve social and environmental problems that were effectively caused by ‘the market’. Having questioned the role of the accounting profession in contributing to broad-based corporate accountability, the paper concludes by questioning the role of accounting and business educators in instilling some form of personal social responsibility in the minds of students.
History
Publication title
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pagination
448-458
ISSN
1045-2354
Department/School
TSBE
Publisher
Academic Press
Place of publication
United Kingdom
Rights statement
Copyright 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Expanding knowledge in commerce, management, tourism and services