University of Tasmania
Browse

The aesthetic value of reef fishes is globally mismatched to their conservation priorities

Download (1.84 MB)
Version 2 2024-11-21, 01:05
Version 1 2023-05-21, 09:10
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-21, 01:05 authored by J Langlois, F Guilhaumon, F Baletaud, N Casajus, C De Almeida Braga, V Fleure, M Kulbicki, N Loiseau, D Mouillot, JP Renoult, A Stahl, Richard Stuart-SmithRichard Stuart-Smith, A-S Tribot, N Mouquet
Reef fishes are closely connected to many human populations, yet their contributions to society are mostly considered through their economic and ecological values. Cultural and intrinsic values of reef fishes to the public can be critical drivers of conservation investment and success, but remain challenging to quantify. Aesthetic value represents one of the most immediate and direct means by which human societies engage with biodiversity, and can be evaluated from species to ecosystems. Here, we provide the aesthetic value of 2,417 ray-finned reef fish species by combining intensive evaluation of photographs of fishes by humans with predicted values from machine learning. We identified important biases in species’ aesthetic value relating to evolutionary history, ecological traits, and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) threat status. The most beautiful fishes are tightly packed into small parts of both the phylogenetic tree and the ecological trait space. In contrast, the less attractive fishes are the most ecologically and evolutionary distinct species and those recognized as threatened. Our study highlights likely important mismatches between potential public support for conservation and the species most in need of this support. It also provides a pathway for scaling-up our understanding of what are both an important nonmaterial facet of biodiversity and a key component of nature’s contribution to people, which could help better anticipate consequences of species loss and assist in developing appropriate communication strategies.

History

Publication title

PLoS Biology

Volume

20

Issue

6

Article number

e3001640

Number

e3001640

Pagination

1-22

ISSN

1544-9173

Department/School

Ecology and Biodiversity

Publisher

Public Library of Science

Publication status

  • Published

Place of publication

United States

Rights statement

© 2022. Langlois et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Socio-economic Objectives

180201 Assessment and management of coastal and estuarine ecosystems

UN Sustainable Development Goals

13 Climate Action, 15 Life on Land

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC