University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Toward better governance of human genomic data

Version 2 2024-07-16, 04:07
Version 1 2023-05-21, 01:21
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-16, 04:07 authored by KC O'Doherty, M Shabani, ES Dove, HB Bentzen, P Borry, MM Burgess, Donald ChalmersDonald Chalmers, J De Vries, Lisa EcksteinLisa Eckstein, SM Fullerton, E Juengst, K Kato, J Kaye, BM Knoppers, BA Koenig, SM Manson, KM McGrail, AL McGuire, EM Meslin, Dianne NicolDianne Nicol, B Prainsack, SF Terry, A Thorogood, W Burke

Here, we argue that, in line with the dramatic increase in the collection, storage and curation of human genomic data for biomedical research, genomic data repositories and consortia have adopted governance frameworks to both enable wide access and protect against possible harms. However, the merits and limitations of different governance frameworks in achieving these twin aims are a matter of ongoing debate in the scientific community; indeed, best practices and points for consideration are notably absent in devising governance frameworks for genomic databases. According to our collective experience in devising and assessing governance frameworks, we identify five key functions of ‘good governance’ (or ‘better governance’) and three areas in which trade-offs should be considered when specifying policies within those functions. We apply these functions as a benchmark to describe, as an example, the governance frameworks of six large-scale international genomic projects.

Funding

Australian Research Council

History

Publication title

Nature Genetics

Volume

53

Issue

1

Pagination

2-8

ISSN

1061-4036

Department/School

Law

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Publication status

  • Published

Place of publication

USA

Rights statement

Copyright © 2021, Springer Nature A

Socio-economic Objectives

230405 Law reform, 280117 Expanding knowledge in law and legal studies, 130301 Bioethics

UN Sustainable Development Goals

16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions