Clinical handover is a high risk scenario involving the transfer of information, responsibility and accountability for patient care. Many strategies have been proposed to improve clinical handover and reduce risks it can pose to the safety and quality of patient care. The development and implementation of electronic tools provides one mechanism for structuring and streamlining information transfer to support more standardised handover practices. However, clinical judgement remains a valued, fundamental aspect of clinical practice and its communication during handover is open to variation in ways that may compromise patient safety. This research examines these issues based on evidence generated from a user-centred approach involving clinicians in the development and implementation of an electronic clinical handover system. The paper highlights how clinical judgements and communicative practices interact with an electronic clinical handover system, and discusses their potential implications for patient safety as part of a broader clinical handover improvement project.
History
Publication title
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume
188
Pagination
168-173
ISSN
0926-9630
Department/School
Tasmanian School of Medicine
Publisher
IOS Press
Place of publication
Netherlands
Rights statement
Copyright 2013 The authors and IOS Press
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Evaluation of health and support services not elsewhere classified