University Of Tasmania

File(s) under permanent embargo

Using someone else's data: problems, pragmatics and provisions

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-16, 17:40 authored by Jo-Anne KelderJo-Anne Kelder
In the current climate of requirements for ethical research, qualitative research data is often archived at the end of each unique research project. Yet qualitative data is capable of being revisited from multiple perspectives, and used to answer different research questions to those envisaged by the original data collector. Using other people's data saves time, avoids unnecessarily burdening your research participants, and adds confidence in interpreting your own data. This paper is a case of how data from one research project was acquired and then analysed to ground the analysis of a separate project using Distributed Cognition (Dcog) theory and its associated methodology, cognitive ethnography. Theoretical considerations were the benefits and difficulties of using multiple sources and types of data in creating a theoretical account of the observed situation. Methodological issues included how to use (and not mis-use) other people's data and coherently integrate data collected over time and for different purposes. Current ethics guidelines come from a paradigm of control suited to experimental, quantitative research approaches. A new paradigm that recognises researchers' inherent lack of control over qualitative research contexts needs to be developed. This research demonstrates the benefits of designing an ethics application to provide for data re-use and giving participants choice over the level of protection they require. © 2005 FQS.


Publication title

Forum: Qualitative Social Research








School of Information and Communication Technology


Forum: Qualitative Social Research

Place of publication

Rights statement

Copyright 2005 FQS

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Other health not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania