A widespread public preference for harsher sentencing (punitiveness) has been documented in a range of national and international studies. The present study examines the relative predictive power of a set of factors most commonly linked with punitiveness. This study is based on the responses given in the largest Australian survey to date of public attitudes to punishment (N = 6005). A combined hierarchical multiple regression model comprising demographic variables, media usage variables, and crime salience variables accounted for a significant 30% of variance in scores for punitiveness. The three variables that emerged as the strongest predictors of punitive attitudes were: perceptions of crime levels; education; and reliance on tabloid/commercial media for news and information. The results have direct implications for how we understand the persistent public preference for punishment and what might be required to ameliorate or respond to that preference.
History
Publication title
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Volume
19
Pagination
249-261
ISSN
1321-8719
Department/School
Faculty of Law
Publisher
Routledge
Place of publication
United Kingdom
Rights statement
Copyright 2012 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law