In this commentary I evaluate what McGowan’s project would conclude with respect to the treatment of professional Australian Football League player Adam Goodes, who was incessantly ‘booed’ by crowds for the final two years of his career. Analysing Goodes’ case in light of McGowan’s argument leads me to two observations. First, McGowan’s norm-enactment approach is incredibly useful because it explains how words like ‘boo’ (with unstable meaning) can constitute actionable discrimination. Second, however, I wonder if a narrow focus on whether such speech is legally actionable might encourage an overestimation of the power of laws to shepherd new g-norms into social practices
Funding
Australian Research Council
History
Publication title
Australasian Philosophical Review
Volume
5
Pagination
203-210
ISSN
2474-0500
Department/School
School of Humanities
Publisher
Routledge
Place of publication
Australia
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Other law, politics and community services not elsewhere classified