This article presents the findings of a study examining the rationale and practices of stock transfer from state housing authorities to community housing associations in three Australian states—Victoria, New South Wales and Tasmania. It begins with an analysis of the policy context that has informed debates about housing management and supply options in Australia. The main section of the article draws on written documentation and interviews with policy actors and tenants in each of the case studies to highlight the conflicts and tensions that surface in moves to reconfigure the management of public housing. Alongside a brief discussion about the policy themes that emerge from the findings, it is suggested in the conclusion that the continuing contestation and uncertainty about the stock transfer process is symptomatic of the national ‘policy vacuum’ about the future direction of public housing in Australia.
History
Publication title
Urban Policy and Research
Volume
22
Pagination
249-263
ISSN
0811-1146
Department/School
School of Social Sciences
Publisher
Carfax Publishing, Taylor and Francis
Place of publication
Oxfordshire, UK
Rights statement
The definitive published version is available online at: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Pacific Peoples community services not elsewhere classified