Key question: which livestock GHG reduction method(s) should receive policy and RD&E focus and which should be avoided or given lesser attention due to differences in farmer adoptability?
Rationale: investment into RD&E, and policy on livestock emission reduction is best aimed at methods which have higher potential adoption rates and faster adoption timeframes. Historic and recent RD&E in livestock emission reduction methods has not sufficiently taken farmer adoptability into account.
Funding
The Northern Tasmanian Natural Resource Management Assoc Inc.
History
Pagination
8
Department/School
Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA)
Place of publication
Hobart, TAS
Repository Status
Restricted
Socio-economic Objectives
Management of greenhouse gas emissions from animal production