University of Tasmania
Hateley_whole_thesis.pdf (478.9 kB)

The relationships between jurors' thinking styles and their evaluations of expert evidence

Download (478.9 kB)
posted on 2023-05-28, 00:03 authored by Hateley, I
Jurors are tasked with analysing evidence presented to them by experts and coming to a verdict based on such information. The presentation of DNA evidence is statistical, often presented as a random match probability. Jurors, who are lay people without prior knowledge of the techniques of DNA analysis, or statistics, risk diverting to common heuristics such as the white coat effect when analysing this information. Individual differences in processing style might influence how jurors appraise evidence. This study examined the relationship between scores in the cognitive reflection task (CRT) and faith in intuition scale (FI) and evaluations of DNA evidence presented by an expert. Participants read case notes pertaining to a crime, rated the strength of evidence, then were randomly allocated to a strong or weak expert testimony condition, and again rated strength of evidence. Participants completed the CRT and FI afterwards. Results showed no meaningful correlation between CRT and the difference in strength of evidence from the case notes to the expert, but a meaningful negative correlation between FI and the difference was found. This suggests individuals high in FI are unlikely to update their beliefs once they form an initial opinion, possibly due to the conservatism heuristic.


Publication status

  • Unpublished

Rights statement

Copyright 2021 the author - The University is continuing to endeavour to trace the copyright owner(s) and in the meantime this item has been reproduced here in good faith. We would be pleased to hear from the copyright owner(s).

Repository Status

  • Open

Usage metrics

    Thesis collection


    No categories selected


    Ref. manager